The system of record for teams shipping with agents
Nazr keeps one canonical plan true for your team while agents ship around it. Customer calls, commits, and agent reports flow in; proposed changes arrive as accept-or-dismiss diffs with provenance; approved work routes to your agents — and commits link back as proof.
Why now
The moment your agents ship faster than you can re-plan, your plan is a lie. And a chat thread can't fix it: chat is single-player — private context, a fork per person, nothing reconciled. A team needs one canonical plan that absorbs what actually happened, not five private threads that each remember a different strategy.
Any AI can write you a plan. Nazr is why it's still true a month later.
How it works
You start with a generated plan — any AI can do that part, and it's a good first five minutes. The product is what happens next: everything that touches your strategy travels one circuit, and nothing changes without you.
“Acme won't renew without SSO” — captured from the call via Granola. Commits, Linear, Notion, Slack, and your agents feed the same stream. You can raise one by hand too.
Nazr analyses the signal against your plan and proposes a change as a diff — pull SSO forward, with the call attached as provenance. You accept or dismiss. Nazr never edits the plan itself.
Your coding agents pull the approved task over MCP, file a completion report, and the commit links back to the task — proof, not a claim. What shipped becomes the next signal.
Everything proposes. You decide. Signals, analysis, and agents can only file proposals. Every change to strategy is a human accepting a diff.
Provenance on every change. Each accepted change carries where it came from — the call, the commit, the agent report — so any line of the plan traces back to its reason.
The loop runs continuously. Not a quarterly re-plan. The plan absorbs reality as it happens, at the pace your agents ship.
One plan, whole team
Nazr is the plan your team shares: durable tasks that keep their identity for months, so commits, signals, and agents keep linking back to the same objects. Each role looks through its own lens at a single centre — switch the lens; this is the live product.
What Nazr is not
Assistants act on your behalf — they auto-apply. A system of record for strategy needs the opposite posture. In Nazr, agents report facts and analysis proposes changes, but only a human touches the plan — every mutation is an accepted diff with an audit trail. The worst a confused agent can do is add noise to your review queue. It can never rewrite your strategy.
The agent rail
Approved tasks are exposed to your coding agents over MCP. Every agent action carries an executor stamp, completion reports say what was claimed, and Nazr-Task commit trailers link the code that shipped back to the task it came from — so git shows what actually happened.
How we're different
Linear tracks work you've already decided on. Nazr governs the layer above — the plan those decisions come from — and keeps it true as agents ship.
See the comparison →Jira rolls tickets up into visibility. Nazr keeps a living plan above the tickets, with every change reviewed by a human.
See the comparison →Who it's for
Built for agent-forward founders and team leads: a plan bigger than one head, agents doing real work, and no patience for the roadmap becoming fiction. If your stack already includes Linear, Granola, and coding agents, Nazr plugs into what you have.
Backed by Techstart Ventures
Nazr is working with a small group of design partners — agent-forward teams who want their plan to stay true. Open the app, or write to hello@nazr.com.
Open app